The DDCIOT-2025, covers the review in two rounds of process. In the first round, the submitted papers of the authors will go through the screening on the basis of their theme, technicality, scope of work and plagiarism which will be scanned by Turnitin/Drillbit.

Upon qualification of the papers, it will be double blind reviewed by at- least three experts according to novelty, originality, completeness, clarity, relevance, significance and research contribution. The decision of the shortlisting will be intimated to the corresponding author that their paper is being accepted for presentation and for proceeding to be published. Authors of some selected accepted papers, presented at the conference, will be invited to submit their manuscripts for consideration in the Special issue Springer book series (AIS) “Algorithms for Intelligent Systems” https://www.springer.com/series/16171 to be indexed in SCOPUS.

Authors are requested to follow the guidelines below :

1. Authors are advised to submit their original and unpublished work (related to the theme of conference). They clearly need to identify the problem,      their contribution(s), and justification with respect to the state- of-the-art work.
2. Manuscripts should not exceed about 10 A-4 size pages, typed one and half space only.
3. Authors need to submit their papers through MS-CMT.
4. The program committee reviews only those papers that develop, argue, and provide results through double-blind reviewing policy.
5. Based on this and their expertise, Organising chairs/Convener will assign papers for a review.
   1. Technical Program Committee members can invite sub-reviewers and can hand over some papers if the papers are not within their field of         expertise.
   2. Technical Program Committee members are, however, still responsible for the quality and timeliness of the reviews allocated originally to         them. Accordingly, the paper/review management system supports the allocation of reviews, at the initiation of TPC members.
6. In all cases, Organising chairs/Conveners will work closely. Based on the review reports and the scores, Organising chairs/Convener will send      notification to the authors via along with the review reports/scores.
7. Notification is based on an average score provided by the assigned reviewers. Note that notification, in the first review, will be straight: accept,      accepted after minor revision and reject. The papers with an average score & similarity index more than 15% will be straight forward rejected.
8. For accepted papers, general chairs will provide an additional revision, if any. This will be mostly useful for those authors who have received major      comments.
9. After having revised versions, we will have exactly the same set of experts for review. On a contradictory review General chairs will help invite an      additional reviewer.
10. After having all review reports/scores, Organising chairs/ Convener will make a final decision. The decisions can be categorized into following :
    1. The papers with average scores will be accepted for the presentation in the Conference & publication in Conference Proceedings only.
    2. Paper with high quality of research work may be considered for publication in an indexed journal.
    3. At the event, we have only oral presentations of the average & good papers both.